Pengaruh Faktor Religiusitas, Akuntabilitas, dan Transparansi Pengelolaan Zakat Terhadap Minat Muzakki Membayar Zakat Melalui Baznas Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of religiosity, accountability, and transparency in *zakat* (alms) management on the intention of *muzakki* (zakat payers) to pay *zakat* through the National Zakat Agency (*Badan Amil Zakat Nasional* – BAZNAS) of Tanjung Jabung Timur Regency, both partially and simultaneously. The study employs a quantitative approach using a survey method with 98 respondents. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with the aid of SPSS software (version 25). The results indicate that religiosity has a positive and significant influence on the *muzakki*'s intention to pay *zakat*, with a regression coefficient of 0.329 and a significance value of 0.002. Accountability also exerts a positive and significant influence, with a regression coefficient of 0.176 and a significance value of 0.016. Meanwhile, transparency shows a positive and significant influence, with a regression coefficient of 0.206 and a significance value of 0.001. Simultaneously, these three variables have a significant effect on the *muzakki*'s intention, as indicated by an F-value of 28.512 (p < 0.001). An Adjusted R-square value of 0.460 suggests that the model explains 46% of the variation in the *muzakki*'s intention, while the remaining 54% is influenced by factors outside the scope of this research model. This study underscores the importance of strengthening religiosity, accountability, and transparency as part of BAZNAS's strategy to increase public interest in distributing *zakat* through an official institution.
References
Bastian, I. (2008). Akuntansi kesehatan. Erlangga.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
Gasperz, J., & Kriswantini, D. (2021). Mengungkap penerapan akuntansi lingkungan pada Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kota Ambon. Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30598/jak.7.1.1-16
Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall.
Hansen, D. R., & Mowen, M. M. (2009). Cost management: Accounting and control (6th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2022). Standar akuntansi keuangan. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
Ikhsan, A. (2008). Akuntansi lingkungan dan pengungkapannya. Graha Ilmu.
Ikhsan, A. (2009). Akuntansi manajemen lingkungan. Graha Ilmu.
Indrawati, N. M., & Intan Saputra Rini, I. G. A. (2018). Analisis penerapan akuntansi lingkungan pada Badan Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah (BRSUD) Tabanan. KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi, 9(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.9.2.2018.85-95
International Federation of Accountants. (2005). International guidance document: Environmental management accounting. IFAC.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2022). Al-Qur’an dan terjemahannya. Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 66 Tahun 2014 tentang Kesehatan Lingkungan.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
















