THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF RELIGIOUS COURTS IN RESOLVING DIFFERENT RELIGION GRANTS CASES: STUDY ON CASE NUMBER 1116/Pdt.P/2019/PA.Sby

Authors

  • Ahmad Ni'am Chabibil Hakim UIN Sunan Kalijaga
  • Khoiruddin Nasution UIN Sunan Kalijaga
  • Daharmi Astuti Universitas Islam Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35896/alhakam.v2i1.299

Keywords:

Absolute Competence, Religious Courts, Different Religion Grants

Abstract

The study discusses the competence of the Religious Courts in accepting and deciding cases of interfaith grants Number: 1116/Pdt.P/2019 /PA.Sby. The main discussion is what the judges’ considerations in deciding the case will be and how will the effect on the results of decision on subsequent Islamic law in Indonesia. This studu is a type of library research. The data were collected using the documentation method with descriptive-analytical method. The application of the grant case being studied is not the same as the provisions in article 49 of Law number 3 of 2006 concerning the Religious Courts, so it is necessary to study on what considerations the Religious Courts accept and decide the case. The result of this study indicate that the absolute competence of the Religious Courts in deciding this case is based on two things : first, the applicant is a Muslim women, in accordance with the principles of the Religious Caurts, namely the principle of Islamic personality. Second, the contract at the time the grant transacsion is carried out is based on Islamic law. This stipulation can be categorized as non-permanent jurisprudence, making it possible to be followed by subsequent judges in similar case as legal considerations to accept new case whose authority is still unclear in try it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Ghofur Anshori, Filsafat Hukum Hibah dan Wasiat di Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: UGM Press, 2011)
Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Abdurahman bin Ishaq Al-Sheikh, Tafsir Ibnu Katsir Jilid 8, alih bahasa M. Abdul Ghoffar E.M., dkk, (Bogor:Pustaka Imam Asy-Syafi’I, 2004)
Departemen Agama, Al-Jumanatul Ali (Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya), Bandung: Jumanatul Ali-Art, 2006.
Haroen, Nasrun, Fiqh Muamalah, Jakarta:Gaya Media pratama, 2000.
Khosyi’ah, Siah, Wakaf dan Hibah Perspektif Ulama Fiqh dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia, Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2010.
Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Pasal 675 poin (5).
Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Pasal 171 (g).
M. Sulaeman Jazuli, Fiqh Madzhab ala Indonesia
Muhammad Nashiruddin Al-Albani, Ringkasan Shahih Muslim, alih bahasa Elly Lathifah, (Jakarta:Gema Insani Press, 2005)
Rosmini, “Falsafah Infaq Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an,” Jurnal Madania, Vol. 20., No. 1 Juni 2016.
Sabiq, Sayyid, Fikih Sunnah 5, alih bahasa Abdurrahim dan masrukhim, Jakarta: Cakrawala Publishing, 2009.
Sanusi, Anwar, Metodologi Penelitian Bisinis, Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2016.
Sheikh, Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Abdurahman bin Ishaq Al-, Tafsir Ibnu Katsir Jilid 1, alih bahasa M. Abdul Ghoffar E.M. dkk, Bogor: Pustaka Imam Asy-Syafi’I, 2004.
Siah Khosyi’ah, Wakaf dan Hibah Perspektif Ulama Fiqh dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia, (Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2010)
Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat), (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2001)
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, cet ke-14, Bandung: ALFABETA, 2011.
Syamsul Anwar, Hukum Perjanjian Syariah, (Jakarta:Rajawali Pers, 2007)
Syeikh Ali Ahmad Jurjawi, Tarjamah Falsafah dan Hikmah Hukum Islam, alih bahasa Hadi Mulyo dan Shobahussurur, (Semarang:Asy-Syifa’, 1992) hlm. 397.
Syeikh Sulaiman Ahmad Yahya Al-Faifi, Ringkasan Fikih Sunnah Sayyid Sabiq, alih bahasa Tirmidzi, Futuhal Arifin, Farhan Kurniawan (Jakarta:Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2013) hlm. 229.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-04

Issue

Section

Artikel

How to Cite

“THE ABSOLUTE COMPETENCE OF RELIGIOUS COURTS IN RESOLVING DIFFERENT RELIGION GRANTS CASES: STUDY ON CASE NUMBER 1116 Pdt.P 2019 PA.Sby”. 2022. Al Hakam: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law and Gender Issues 2 (1): 18-34. https://doi.org/10.35896/alhakam.v2i1.299.